Paul Hawken’s “Healing or Stealing?” 2009 commencement address
It is time to return to the ideas in this address by the brilliant Paul Hawken, from 2009’s University of Portland graduation. Some excerpts here~
The living world is not “out there” somewhere, but in your heart. What do we know about life? In the words of biologist Janine Benyus, life creates the conditions that are conducive to life. I can think of no better motto for a future economy. We have tens of thousands of abandoned homes without people and tens of thousands of abandoned people without homes. We have failed bankers advising failed regulators on how to save failed assets. We are the only species on the planet without full employment. Brilliant. We have an economy that tells us that it is cheaper to destroy earth in real time rather than renew, restore, and sustain it. You can print money to bail out a bank but you can’t print life to bail out a planet. At present we are stealing the future, selling it in the present, and calling it gross domestic product. We can just as easily have an economy that is based on healing the future instead of stealing it. We can either create assets for the future or take the assets of the future. One is called restoration and the other exploitation. And whenever we exploit the earth we exploit people and cause untold suffering. Working for the earth is not a way to get rich, it is a way to be rich.
Ralph Waldo Emerson once asked what we would do if the stars only came out once every thousand years. No one would sleep that night, of course. The world would create new religions overnight. We would be ecstatic, delirious, made rapturous by the glory of God. Instead, the stars come out every night and we watch television.
This extraordinary time when we are globally aware of each other and the multiple dangers that threaten civilization has never happened, not in a thousand years, not in ten thousand years. Each of us is as complex and beautiful as all the stars in the universe. We have done great things and we have gone way off course in terms of honoring creation. You are graduating to the most amazing, stupefying challenge ever bequested to any generation. The generations before you failed. They didn’t stay up all night. They got distracted and lost sight of the fact that life is a miracle every moment of your existence. Nature beckons you to be on her side. You couldn’t ask for a better boss. The most unrealistic person in the world is the cynic, not the dreamer. Hope only makes sense when it doesn’t make sense to be hopeful. This is your century. Take it and run as if your life depends on it.
Read the full text at http://www.up.edu/commencement/default.aspx?cid=9456
The etiquette of the signature
So, how many emails do you get in a day?And how many from folks you don’t know (not spam) but need to respond to?
If you are leading a business or consultancy, that number is going to be high, and the number of new-contacts-to-known-colleagues will be disproportionately high, given our active networking, prospecting, and the high number of referrals to us from those events and from our clients and colleagues.
So, trying not to rant, this is a call out to everyone:add a signature that lets us know your mobile phone number and your location (like your city or time zone)!It is both polite and efficient.
In the past few days, I have had to search for or ask for the phone number or location of 5 new folks who have asked to meet with me.In one case I responded to an invitation to connect by suggesting a cafe in Santa Monica (Los Angeles), when the fellow was in San Francisco (but who knew?He didn’t indicate this in any way, just asked for a meeting, and he was referred to me by my local client).
I know we live in the word of texting and tweeting and following each other around in cyberspace.I like that too.But when I want to set a meeting or close a deal, I need to know what time zone I’m working with, and how to actually speak to the person if sudden change arises (more often when we are all so busy, and especially an issue when traveling across L.A.).
Now, in my good-manners way, I have several signatures set up for different applications, all in a simple drop-down menu.
- One is just my phone number under my name, for easy access.
- One has just my phone number and URL, for folks who are newly introduced.
- One has all my contact information – name, city, phone, Skype name, and live links to my website, blog, twitter, and Linked, for those who will need to know this, particularly international colleagues and clients.
- One adds my snail mail address and is only used when invoices are sent out.
The use of a signature also allows you to indicate how you prefer your communication – “texting preferred”and “mobile” vs. “office” and so on.
This simple courtesy will ease your communications with everyone, and perhaps increase the response rate you receive to your messages.Try it.
Tactics of Successful Negotiation: part 1 of 4: Standing up for your value
Here is a 4-part series of weekly posts on the Tactics of Successful Negotiation:1) Standing up for your value;2) Learning the pace of negotiation;3) Overcoming your demon voices; and4) Coming from Abundance–the real power.
“Never go to the negotiation table unless you are willing to walk away.”This was my first lesson in negotiating, when I was just starting out.
Later, when I better understood value pricing, I learned the second lesson: you will never get paid what you deserve if you don’t request it, and stand up for your value.
Both of these lessons apply to product lines, service offerings and consulting practices. For ease of language, I will use “your offering” to stand for all of these.
Many sales or gigs are unnecessarily lost in the pitching or in the back-and-forth negotiating on price and terms, because you do not stand up for the value of your offering, and because you will not walk away from a deal that destroys your margins or compromises your ability to deliver a quality result. This is especially true when there is a Big Brand on the other side of the table.
I work with my clients to consistently raise their value pricing for services, or their product pricing, in a steady way until we reach the maximum that the market and our margins will allow.Some of this is in the presentation, the offer, the bundle, the terms, and some of it is in the negotiation itself.
To stand up for your value, you must believe in your value.Sounds simple, but I watch many of my successful clients doubt themselves when the negotiation takes too long (or they think it is taking too long), and begin to talk about lowering the price of their offering, or bundling more for the same price, and otherwise cutting their power and their profit margins.
I repeatedly stop my clients from negotiating against themselves (see Part 2: Learning the pace of negotiations, next week).I make them wait for a response, for an objection, for a counter-offer.I convince them to start with a higher number that is acceptable in their market, and see what happens. This strategy is appropriate because their Big Brand customer already knows them (and their value) and has invited them back for more work, or more products.
My clients are not in an RFP (request for proposal) situation where they are bidding against unknown competitors– they are experts sought out for their services and products.It astonishes me that they doubt their value and their pricing in these circumstances.
But the “knot in the pit of my stomach” as one client put it, is very common.Very few of us have been trained to negotiate (even our Big Brand partners).Negotiation takes an inner confidence (which you can learn –see Parts 3 and 4, upcoming), careful pacing, discipline, and willingness to both maintain your value pricing and margins, as well as willingness to accommodate your client or customer with your service or product.All this can be learned over time.
More on all this again next Friday.
Tactics of Successful Negotiation: part 2 of 4: Learning the pace of negotiation
Let’s talk about the negotiation itself.
What I end up teaching my clients is that they must 1) stay the course, 2) watch their margins, 3) assume the true value of their offering, and 4) be prepared to walk away from a deal that doesn’t work for them.Sometimes this is about confidence, and often it is about not “negotiating against yourself” by offering compromises before those compromises need to be put on the table.
Negotiating is a back-and-forth ritual.You propose the scope of work and set a price.The Big Brand answers back with an objection, or a reduction in scope, or an increase in scope for the same price (called “scope creep” – when the scope of work is allowed to creep up without more compensation), or some vague notion of budget constraints.
Negotiation is a finely paced dance.Here’s what to do:
- Notice the level of the person doing the negotiating.If he or she is not the true decision-maker, make certain to give this person what he needs to make his case one level higher in Management, but save your significant concessions for the real decision maker or the last step.
- If you are communicating by email (not face to face), offer only one concession for each communication (if you can do this without damaging your margins).If you are negotiating face to face, but not with the ultimate decision maker, behave the same way.
- Answer only the questions that are asked, and no more.If you are asked what is involved in a certain stage of work that makes it cost so much, answer that.
- Do not offer to reduce your price, nor to add to the scope of work — it is not time yet for final concessions.
- Do not protest that this amount of work is worthy of the price you have set for it.Just answer the questions, and stand by the value of your offering and its price.Silence speaks of authority.
After the stages of management have done their work, and you are negotiating with the actual decision maker (by email or in person), be prepared to make certain concessions (at this final stage) to close the sale.
But don’t offer any concessions at first.Let the decision maker suggest what he or she needs (it’s the other side’s turn to offer). You don’t know where the pressure points lie.Instead, if the decision maker is not making a counter-offer, but just pressuring you to negotiate against yourself (a tactic to make you cave in), ask a simple but powerful question:“What is it that is holding up the close of this agreement?Perhaps I can help if I know.”
You may very well get an answer that had not occurred to you.For example, the decision maker may say, “We value your work, and need Phases 1 and 2 done during this fiscal quarter.But our budget doesn’t fill up again until next quarter.It is only an allocation problem, but we only have budget for Phase 1 now.”
In this situation, you can offer to accept a purchase order for the full amount, with payment for Phase 1 now, and a delayed payment for Phase 2 and beyond (given you trust the Big Brand’s purchase order, and given that your margins allow this delay).This pays the full amount, maintains your value pricing, establishes that value and price into the future, and only delays a partial payment.
Similarly, you may re-configure your product mix, or the territories to which you initially deliver, or create a rollout strategy, to allow the sale to close while protecting your margins.
If you don’t ask, you won’t know how to offer the solution.
This is part 2 of a 4-part series of weekly posts on the Tactics of Successful Negotiation:1) Standing up for your value;2) Learning the pace of negotiation;3) Overcoming your demon voices; and4) Coming from Abundance–the real power.
Tactics of Successful Negotiation: part 3 of 4: Overcoming your demon voices
Your demons play in your head and make you a weak negotiator: they say, “You really need this account,” or “They can get anyone to do this, they don’t have to choose me for this consulting work (or product mix).” “Can I really deliver what I am promising?” And even, “Why should they listen to me?” Every new email of negotiation, every question from the client or customer can make you doubt your value, your price, and your likelihood of closing the sale.
Some of these noises in your head may be true, but you are the one doing the negotiating, so the Big Brand has already chosen you, at least initially (this is not a request for proposal competition).
The secret is to notice, repeatedly, that your demons get it wrong. They whisper in your ear that you cannot win, that the world is set against you, that anyone else can do what you can do or deliver what you are selling, and so on.
From this context, everything looks dreary, and you dread even the simplest negotiation. And you should, since this attitude is setting you up for failure in selling your product or your service.
From this perspective, every objection to your offer looks like a criticism. And it is rarely a criticism, as companies don’t actually negotiate with vendors or consultants who do not promise some value to them. So if you are in the negotiation, it is just that – a negotiation. Not a criticism of you, your offering or your product. It isn’t about you at all. It is about budgets and allocations, and internal power politics, and everything except you. So, get your ego in line, and silence those demon voices.
One company executive told my client, “I would hire you in a second for that work, if money weren’t an issue.” This relieved my client of his weeks-long dread that he had offended that executive by pitching an aggressive solution to the problem with an appropriately aggressive price tag. In their conversation, price was not mentioned at all, only the executive’s budget. In fact, the price was acknowledged as appropriate by the opening statement.
In another case, the negotiations went on through several phases, and all of the questions turned out to be about each level of management proving the worth of the product mix to the next level up. When the deal (not changed at all from the beginning proposal) reached the decision maker, there was enough material for her to sign the deal without question.
None of the back-and-forth communication ever questioned the value or the price of the proposed product, its mix, its price or its terms. My client suffered doubts, and suggested we offer concessions each time he got email on this subject, when the email was all about the buyer’s internal system for selling up the management ladder.
One of the tactics of building confidence is noticing what actually happens in the real world, separate from your dreads of what will happen. After noticing what happens, you must then remember each instance of success (or the reasons for failure) until you turn your context from your doubts and demon-voice nay-saying into a grounded assessment of what is true about your position, your service, your product, and your reputation in the real world.
If you are a glass-half-empty person, this will take some time. But persistence will help. Keep notes if that works. Have someone around to remind you.
This is part 3 of a 4-part series of weekly posts on the Tactics of Successful Negotiation: 1) Standing up for your value; 2) Learning the pace of negotiation; 3) Overcoming your demon voices; and 4) Coming from Abundance–the real power.
Tactics of Successful Negotiation: part 4 of 4: Coming from Abundance–the real power
Context is a powerful vehicle for your success in the world.You can come from Abundance (the trust that there is enough in the world for everyone – that is, your glass is half full and more will come soon), or from Scarcity (the surety you must compete for every small gain – that is, your glass if half empty and likely poisoned).
Essentially, you must move through the world as if you had everything you need (this is called “coming from Abundance”).From this context, your proposed work that is under negotiation would be interesting to do, if the client can pay for the value you will deliver to them. If not, not. You don’t need it if they don’t want to pay for it. Of course you can negotiate, or meet them halfway, or make allowances for their situation, or be generous, and come to terms on a gig. But you must come from the Abundance of not needing any of it, because that is the position of strength.
This context of Abundance must hold in your center, even if you are “broke and alone,” as we say of the mantra of the Demon. From a position of Abundance, the gig or sale you turn down because it doesn’t meet your criteria or your margins will open the window to the next sale, which will be better for you — more interesting, with more respect, and in which you give more value.
And this is not airy-fairy positive thinking, although the context is positive.If you accept a sale or a gig that is high-maintenance, or low-margin, or will clearly involve un-compensated scope creep, you have set yourself up to fail in several ways:you will over-work the contract; you will remove yourself from your ongoing networking and marketing activities that predict your next sales; you will add a time-burden to your day that may affect the quality of your other work; and if your margins are compromised – you won’t make any bottom line revenue for all your trouble.
Better to leave yourself open to the next opportunity, or upsell an existing client, or pursue that marketing opportunity you now have time for.The winning isn’t about the sale – the winning is to add to your profit line, which creates the next Abundance for the next opportunity.
Here is a 4-part series of weekly posts on the Tactics of Successful Negotiation:1) Standing up for your value;2) Learning the pace of negotiation;3) Overcoming your demon voices; and4) Coming from Abundance–the real power.
Italian Financial Crisis: A.D. 33
I recently found an interesting passage in Will Durant’s classic Caesar and Christ: A History of Roman Civilization and Christianity from the beginnings to A.D. 325, which is Part III of his and Ariel Durant’s The Story of Civilization.
The famous “panic” of A.D. 33 illustrates the development and complex interdependence of banks and commerce in the Empire. Augustus had coined and spent money lavishly, on the theory that its increased circulation, low interest rates, and rising prices would stimulate business. They did; but as the process could not go on forever, a reaction set in as early as 10 B.C., when this flush minting ceased. Tiberius rebounded to the opposite theory that the most economical economy is the best. He severely limited the governmental expenditures, sharply restricted new issues of currency, and hoarded 2,700,000,000 sesterces in the Treasury.
The resulting dearth of circulating medium was made worse by the drain of money eastward in exchange for luxuries. Prices fell, interest rates rose, creditors foreclosed on debtors, debtors sued usurers, and money-lending almost ceased. The Senate tried to check the export of capital by requiring a high percentage of every senator’s fortune to be invested in Italian land; senators thereupon called in loans and foreclosed mortgages to raise cash, and the crisis rose. When the senator Publius Spinther notified the bank of Balbus and Ollius that he must withdraw 30,000,000 sesterces to comply with the new law, the firm announced its bankruptcy.
At the same time the failure of an Alexandrian firm, Seuthes and Son due to their loss of three ships laden with costly spices and the collapse of the great dyeing concern of Malchus at Tyre, led to rumors that the Roman banking house of Maximus and Vibo would be broken by their extensive loans to these firms. When its depositors began a “run” on this bank it shut its doors, and later on that day a larger bank, of the Brothers Pettius, also suspended payment. Almost simultaneously came news that great banking establishments had failed in Lyons, Carthage, Corinth, and Byzantium. One after another the banks of Rome closed. Money could be borrowed only at rates far above the legal limit. Tiberius finally met the crisis by suspending the land-investment act and distributing 100,000,000 sesterces to the banks, to be lent without interest for three years on the security of realty. Private lenders were thereby constrained to lower their interest rates, money came out of hiding, and confidence slowly re-turned.
This wonderful piece arrived in my Inbox without credit to its original creator — thank you, anonymous writer. It is humbling to realize how long our financial errors have been repeated without our learning our lessons, from history or from our own pain. ~joey
Over-zealous (drunken?) networking – some rules of etiquette
There are boundaries that we might expect in social behavior, especially in professional networking.But sometimes our bad manners show up, and this must flash us a message to watch our actions.
I was attending a going-away party for a long-term client of mine, as she moved on to other adventures.There were the usual roasts and testimonials, and the team was re-connecting with past employees who had come by.Folks were mildly buzzed and having a good time.
Near the end of the event, as I was leaving, a former employee (who had since become an independent consultant) accosted me, moving aggressively into my personal space, saying,
“How’s your business?You are still working with the same kind of clients as before, aren’t you?”
I backed up a few steps, and said I was, and that the business was going fine.
“Well, you can refer me to your clients, can’t you?” he said, thrusting his card towards me.
I had not been in touch with this person in many years, since he had left the company.I demurred that perhaps my client base was not the best fit for his services.
“Sure they are!I work with that size company too!”
As I stepped back even farther, he recognized that I was not responding, and immediately turned to a former executive from the company, and began the same type of questioning.
I was so offended, I was nearly speechless.Now, maybe he was drunk, as it was the end of the evening (this is no excuse).His interaction was so self-serving, so completely un-interested in me or my business, except as a lead source for him, that I took his card and wrote “blog” on it, to make sure I would write about the good manners of professional networking.
So, here goes.
Before you ask for a favor, spend some time with genuine interest in your source.Find out what they really offer their clients, whether their client base is actually a fit for your services, and how your source would best position you to them.If appropriate, discuss referral fees for those clients that work with you.
Give before you get.Send articles, free passes to conferences, or introductions of interest to your source.
Build a relationship.If you are interested in this colleague, create a continuing presence in his or her professional life.
Networking continues to be a hot topic and subject of groups, online matching sites, and books and articles.But the truth is, you only get valuable referrals from your colleagues
- ·who understand your work and its value;
- ·who trust you not to embarrass them with their clients and colleagues;
- ·who know the criteria of your target prospects profiles;
- ·who have a real relationship with you over time.
In light of this, the consultant’s behavior at the party was completely inappropriate on many levels, and left the clear impression that he was desperate for business, and did not know how to behave professionally.Now I will not refer him even if someone asks me directly about his skills.He broke all four of the criteria above.And he did damage to his reputation.
So, tread more professionally, be careful how much you drink, and consider the occasion in which (and the person whom) you solicit for referrals to your business.
How much to tell investors when pitching for capital
I am often asked how much to reveal when pitching for venture or angel capital. The rationale varies: “ I’m not quite ready for a big investment until I get more early traction” or “Will I weaken my position by showing how much I need and how soon I need it?” or “Will what I’m looking for move around the community to everyone and shouldn’t I be selective in what I say?”
The answer is to stand up and lay out your plans and your rationale. You must treat all investors as if they will become your partners, starting immediately. If you are taking a pitch meeting, you might as well pitch.
You will not see an investment without the interested investor (private, angel or venture capitalist) conducting enough due diligence to know your basic position and condition in the market. So, there isn’t much to hide.
You may not get a second meeting, especially if you are not forthcoming in the first meeting. It is so difficult to get a first meeting that clarity is to your advantage.
It is acceptable to take a short meeting (20 minutes maximum) or two with potential investors, to get on their radar about your idea, even before you are ready to approach them for an investment. You can report back on your progress of reaching your benchmarks. This establishes an early relationship with them, and allows them to watch you deliver the benchmarks you promised.
Suppose you are looking for angel capital now, and you are presenting to an early stage boutique venture capitalist, who invests in revenue-generating companies, but who sometimes will step down to a seed round of a few hundred thousand dollars.
Pitch what you want now: say $250,000, and show what you will use the funds for, and what benchmark you will reach with that seed round. Your potential investor might provide it and add a deal structure to his position for the next round, giving him right of first look, or protecting his investment in certain ways, even setting aside all or part of your next round.
Next you say you want to raise a Series A round after some specified consecutive months of growth. You say when you expect that moment to arrive (what Quarter of what year), and what benchmark you will reach in what Quarter of what year with that Series A round.
You can say that you will look for a growth round following Series A, once you can track the speed of your growth, and can assess competition and market conditions at that time.
This shows you are thinking all the way out to scalability and ROI. If you look to your investors as long-term partners, this early truth telling and planning sets your relationship on the right path. If you are beginning your company with Other People’s Money, it is good to have a strong relationship with the Other People and their Money.
Four generations in the workplace – attitudes, conflicts and choices
My colleague Amy Hirsh Robinson, Principal at The Interchange Group, shared this fascinating examination of generational issues in the workplace (her consulting specialty, see www.interchange-group.com).The link is to the cover story, “Mixing it Up,” in the May 2011 issue of HR Magazine, in a thorough article by Adrienne Fox, wherein Amy is quoted extensively from her history in this work.http://bit.ly/iyf0Kq
I have been a student of these issues for many years, as my own client base currently ranges from 27 to 62, covering three of these generations: Boomers, GenX’s and Millennials.
My first introduction to these concepts was my reading of the 1991 book, Generations, by Strauss & Howe, which I highly recommend, along with their subsequent books (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generations_%28book%29 ).
The Interchange Group is offering a webinar on the May 19th on “Recruiting the Class of 2011.”If you are interested, you may register here:
http://www.interchange-group.com/w1_webinar.html.
I am happy to have your thoughts on these compelling issues.