10 Characteristics of a Successful CEO: #9 Keeping perspective on the larger scheme of things
Keeping your perspective that your venture is but one part of a larger, more complex market is essential to success. Understanding your company’s position and value in the supply chain allows you to make the correct decisions about what power you have in a negotiation, how to craft a win-win deal that keeps the other players supportive of your company’s interests, and keeps you a sincere participant in the larger network of companies that create your market sphere. And this perspective maintains your reputation in your industry, whether you grow your company for decades or move to a new venture in a few years.
There are serious consequences to losing this perspective, which is easy to do, especially when our passion for our vision of our business becomes so embedded in our identity that the whole world seems (or seems not to) reflect our own focus. But the world is not reflecting our passion. Our obsession is clouding our vision of the larger scheme of things.
I once read that addiction is the condition of narrowing one’s world view and focus to the getting and using of the addictive substance, such that all other activities become nothing more than a part of this quest. The obsession with our success in our own business is a kind of addiction.
Notice the power of this sequence:
- our passionate vision becomes linked to our identity;
- our success is the outward reflection of that passion;
- our success becomes our identity;
- our obsession to protect and project our identity begins to narrow our world to a single focus on this success;
- our identity becomes dependent at its source on everything that contributes to or interferes with that success;
- our interpretation of other aspects of our life and the larger world become no more than parts of our quest.
- our focus remains turned inward to our obsession, and we begin to lose perspective on the larger world that doesn’t know us or care about us and on our immediate world of friends and family and community that does care about us.
This loss of perspective shows up in many forms.
- We are home with our family, but we aren’t paying attention.
- Our children speak to us but we aren’t listening.
- Our minds are never focused except on the business, shutting out even our community involvement.
- We watch our business partners for signs of disloyalty or lack of full commitment to our vision.
- We expect our staff to be available 24/7, even when they are not even partial owners of the business.
- We mis-read the larger market picture, because our company is not the center of the market.
- We become short-tempered with anyone (especially those closest to us) who is not focused on our company’s success.
- We become boring, as we cannot speak about anything but our business.
- We lose our perspective on our position and value in the supply chain and the larger market.
- We forget that much of the world doesn’t know we exist. And doesn’t care.
- We lose our sense of humor.
- We forget how to relax, enjoy ourselves, and take pleasure in other activities.
- We lose our balance with all the other things in the world.
And this loss of perspective can happen whether the new company is succeeding or failing.
Often when the new company begins to succeed, something worse happens. This happens more often to first-time entrepreneurs, or entrepreneurs having their first taste of real success. We are eaten by the power dragon. Once the power dragon has us, our identity loses all semblance of its perspective. We, tasting the first sweet nibble of power, become extreme in our ego and sense of importance. Everything we do is significant. And, consequently, most things other people do becomes insignificant, even annoying.
As this perspective grows stronger and more evident, many folks around us begin to express their doubts about our business and our perspective. We become short-tempered and more suspicious than before.
Once the power dragon has us, it is a difficult (perhaps impossible) challenge to return to our former more rational selves. If we are lucky, the power dragon spits us out, and we have only lost the capital, or the business, or our self-regard. Hopefully we have not lost our family, as many first-time entrepreneurs do, especially the successful ones.
An investor’s worst nightmare is to find their CEO eaten by the power dragon, perspective lost, and bad decisions coming into play. I have watched these first-time successes lose everything just as the success was arriving. Seems there is no way to predict this occurrence.
So, I shall share a code word with you who play with the power dragon: Ozymandius, King of Kings. That’s you, someday, if you cannot regain your balance.
OZYMANDIAS
by Percy Bysshe Shelley, 1818
I met a traveller from an antique land
Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed.
And on the pedestal these words appear:
“My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!”
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.
10 Characteristics of a Successful CEO #10: Courage to move forward, or stop, and to know when to do either one.
“Stop this company before you develop its product – you have already wrecked your equity allocation and cap table with your handshake deals. Find another company to build.” (He did.)
“This is a fine company but it is a “back-bedroom” lifestyle business. It will make you and your founding team a nice living after the risk you have already put into it, but it seems unlikely to grow to create significant wealth for any of you. You have other much more lucrative offers that have experienced teams waiting for you, and with less risk attached. Relegate this company to the back bedroom and let it make a couple hundred thousand a year with very little attention, and share that among your partners.” (He did.)
“There are five market realities that tell us that this business cannot succeed, no matter how much the others say they want you to join as a founding partner, or how excited they are about the market potential. One: the patent on which the new technology is based has been allowed to expire. Two: you have no defensibility against your proving the market for this product and then having an offshore manufacturer produce and land a competitive product at less than one-tenth of your price, just as the mass market is ready for it. Three: market realities….” (He did not join this product business, but continued his successful consulting practice).
“The capital investment players are telling us that they are not seeing the value in this product. Even if they are mistaken, now that you are out of seed capital, your valuation at Series A will be so low that you are likely to lose control for your company by Series B, as your time to market is uncertain and could take much longer than you have planned. If this happens – if you miss your benchmarks in Series A, and find yourself in a down round in Series B – you may find yourself working for your investors without control of your company for the next several years, with no control over its growth or exit. So we should re-think your launch strategy, find strategic capital rather than equity capital, and grow organically or in niche markets or international markets until we have capitalized the company in a new way.” (She tried this approach but the economic crash caught her and the business could not be sustained).
“You must focus this enormous idea on a single market (pick enterprise, business or consumer) and productize this idea for that market and a target profile customer. This kind of product can be built quickly, with minimal capital, and thrown into the market in a soft launch or “Google beta” to see what feedback we get for refining the product. Then refine the product and move on from the soft launch to a hard launch, and get started. The longer you think about all the potential markets and products this idea can generate, the best markets will be closed to you.” (He did not, and missed his market timing, never gained significant market share, and his investors “sold” the company for its assets some years later, never creating wealth).
“I don’t like it. You offer your partner a chance to buy you out at $5-8 million before you put the company on the block for sale. You don’t know what competitive offers you may receive. You are leaving too much money on the table. Oh, the partner didn’t get it, so he turned it down? O.k., so now we write in the offering documents that as CEO you are available for 120 days’ orderly transition, then you are gone. That may limit your potential buyers to those that have management they want to put it place. It may reduce your ultimate valuation. But you will be free to move on to the next thing. If you are willing to risk these unknowns, we can write this in.” (She did, and the company sold for $50M and she walked away with $25M).
These stories are based on actual events. In some cases, the entrepreneur moved forward, in other cases he abandoned his plans. In one, she drew her boundaries and stuck to them. In others, the CEO persisted and the company perished, even after a long life.
As a CEO, you need courage. Every day you are faced with critical decisions, small and large, that determine the success of your company. For many CEOs, moving forward is the easier way – especially if the company has momentum. Then, moving forward is the path of least resistance. And sometimes moving forward is just the desperation of not knowing any other path to take.
Sometimes, moving forward means changing your strategic direction in a significant way. This can be more difficult than moving forward in the original direction. This flexibility takes courage to withstand the doubt it may place in others’ minds, or the criticism by those who do not understand how this shift fits into your larger vision.
It takes courage to stop. Many emotional issues are in play, even if they are unrecognized. Fear of failure. Embarrassment. Concern for the welfare of the team. Denial that the company is beyond recall. Loss of the dream which may have become your identity.
You need courage even to stop to think about stopping. It is an act of bravery to slow down long enough to objectively examine the company’s financial information, market data and product cycles (R&D and sales both), and to look at the information objectively, as if it were someone else’s company.
It takes courage to decide. To decide a strategy, a hire or fire, a new direction. Especially it takes courage to decide to stop – to stop before you begin, or before you take that first outside capital, or in the face of unforeseen market or economic changes. It takes courage to stop your company, to give the team and your colleagues and your market the news.
And it takes courage to stop your company and not to take on this ending as a mark of failure. A company can fail (or you can change your mind for valid reasons) without your failing as a person. The courage comes from the strength to separate your identity from your venture, to assess the qualities of each not in relation to the other.
I have said for many years, “When you have won one, lost one, and come back again to start your third company, then you can call yourself an entrepreneur.”
And the ultimate courage is to stay, or change direction, or take your best shot, or stop your company – and then walk on, self-confidence intact, and take your next best shot.
You can do it. If you have the courage to start a company, you have the ultimate courage to carry on as you decide. Good luck.
Venture Capitalists want entrepreneurs with proven capital control
There was a repeated focus on capital control by entrepreneurs at Digital Hollywood’s Venture Capital panel in Los Angeles which I chaired a couple of weeks ago http://bit.ly/cpbI4w .
Trends still tight
Economic trends are still tight for entrepreneurs, and also for VCs looking to replenish their own Funds from their institutional investors. This is driving a trend to invest in early stage companies that can show a proven record of how they control their cash.
Investors’ due diligence questions
- How cost-effectively did the founders develop their product using available tools, barter, and sweat equity?
- What salaries are they paying the team, and what salaries do they expect after funding?
- Are they a virtual team or are they spending on office space? If in an office, is it in an incubator or a reduced-rent situation?
- Are their books in order, showing an understanding of the financial side of the business, and a rational balance of spending to revenue?
- Does their history of spending show a waste of money or a penchant for indulgence?
- Have they created debt which is burdensome?
- Do their projections anticipate the reality of time to market, channel building, and other market factors that can slow growth?
Rational valuations
The venture capitalists also recommended more rational control by entrepreneurs when setting their valuations. If the valuations are set too high, and based on benchmarking, and the benchmark is missed, a down round is sure to follow. In terms of driving the value of the company over the long run, to its acquisition multiple or IPO valuation at its exit, it is wiser to take more controlled steps to avoid a down round. That means controlling the valuation, the benchmark, and the step up to each benchmark, so that the growth curve of the company looks continuously rising, to an ultimate exit. This discipline is part of the capital control the VCs are seeking.
An uptick in new investments
There is indeed an uptick in investing again, in new companies and first rounds, not just bridge loans and mezzanine rounds. I think the press is hyping how much of that new investing is occurring, but this panel definitely indicated several first rounds in new companies.
So, although we’ve heard about capital control before, it is now becoming a more formal part of the review of any company before green lighting a first meeting or an investment. It is wise for entrepreneurs to get professional help in presenting their current books and in building out their projections, carefully delineating their assumptions and plans.
Keeping your mouth shut and not raising your hand: a riff off Einstein
“If A equals success, then the formula is: A=X+Y+Z. X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut.”
Albert Einstein
I love this quote. It doesn’t, of course, offer any mathematical values to X or Y or Z, but it could imply that they come in equal measures.
The balance of work and play is essential to success. And the virtue of Z, keeping your mouth shut, is incalculable.
We learn different lessons at different times in our lives. I learned to balance work and play rather early in my career. I look like a Type A but I am good at being a Type D as well, especially when living on the sailboat, or summering in Maine while working. Both conditions slow me down, and in fact can make me more effective.
Now, Z took me longer to learn. Perhaps more than 20 years. I had experienced my 15 minutes of small fame, and settled into a deeper experience of consulting, with more wisdom and less noise. I had seen a lot and learned more each year as I progressed. Every year I would review my calendar (the big paper A4 Architects Diary I use to track my life – never mind the electronic version) and notice what I had learned that was new, and what I had learned yet again.
But then I learned Z: keeping my mouth shut. I found I didn’t have to jump in with an answer. I could wait to see what the CEO or the team thought first. Someone else might come up with it, or with something adjacent, that was perhaps more interesting, or more suited to the team or the market.
And part of Z is this, too: you don’t have to raise your hand. You can watch and wait. Just because you know how to do something doesn’t mean you are the one who should do it. It may be better to let someone else do it. And it may not be part of your role, so it may even be inappropriate for you to do it. If you are the CEO, or the consultant to the CEO, it may be better that the team learn and do this task. After all, as CEO, you can’t do all the operations (you have other tasks only you can do), and as the consultant, you shouldn’t be usurping the team’s responsibilities.
And, when you consider X and Y, if you keep raising your hand for the stuff others should be doing, there will be only X and no Y.
Trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly …
I was working with one of my favorite clients the other day, when I heard myself tell him, “Absolutely – your must be trustworthy, your must offer full disclosure, and never let anyone darken your reputation – you know, loyal, helpful, kind – all that.”
I realized this list was from some childhood mantra taught in America, so deep in our culture that I could recite half the list and not know where it came from. So I looked it up. It was the Boy Scout Law (I admit I didn’t think to look up the Brownies or the Girl Scouts).
Now, I am not politically correct enough to know if the Boy Scouts of America is a respected group these days, or a para-military organization. And I don’t care. In these days of bad behavior and rampant corruption (or the same level of corruption and rampant press coverage), it is good to remember the lessons of our most traditional and old-fashioned cultural upbringing, and not shy away from repeating them for fear of seeming un-cool.
So, here goes: Scout Law (British version)
- A Scout is trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, and brave.
This original version by Lord Baden-Powell had these 10 points to the Scout Law. Two more, “clean and reverent” were added by the Americans, which I don’t find useful enough to include. (Thanks, Wikipedia http://bit.ly/cxbMmw )
I especially like “cheerful.” I also like the Scout Motto and Slogan – especially for business folks in a challenging economy, when opportunity is more and more based on the strength of trusted relationships:
- Be Prepared and Do a good turn daily.
Bus money
I was thinking about money and freedom when I heard an NPR interview with Merle Haggard, the country music legend, now 72, talking to NPR’s Steve Inskeep about hopping freight trains in his youth. http://n.pr/aedMlf
“I rode a freight from Oregon back to Bakersfield — that’s over a bunch of mountains,” Haggard says. “It was wintertime — there was snow and there was ice and two others hobos and me crammed down into an ice compartment of an old refrigerator car, looking at each other with nothing to say.”
Inskeep asks, “What did you learn from that?”
“Take enough money to ride a bus,” Haggard says, laughing.
I laughed out loud too. When I was 16, I headed out of the house one day to run an errand on my motorcycle. My father looked up and asked, “Do you have money?”
“Sure,” I said, “what do you mean?”
“Always carry at least $100 in cash in your pocket.” Back then that was a lot of cash.
“O.k.” I said. “But why?”
“You can’t bribe a policeman with a credit card,” he winked.
I have never left my house without at least $100 in cash since that day.
This got me thinking about the freedom a little cash can bring. My Daddy wanted me to be able to get out of trouble on my own. And I applied this going forward into my business. One of the ways to survive economic upheavals we cannot predict or control, is to have enough money for the bus. Merle Haggard would have been warmer, even if he had lost that story. My flexibility to choose my clients (and work only with the most promising entrepreneurs) would be restricted if I didn’t have savings to smooth the regular tech downturns and general recessions.
Since my Daddy taught me this lesson, I have always maintained a cash buffer against trouble. Of course, the only way to build a cash buffer is to build it – to begin the discipline of putting some cash out of your own hands where it can work for you, whether you are young and not thinking about such things, or rebuilding your retirement account or business that just got eaten by the current economic crash. Certain savings (retirement, profit sharing, educational savings) give you significant tax breaks.
So here are some resources about savings, cost of debt, and compounding interest that might get you on your way. http://bit.ly/brCAqN
Put an initial $100 into a savings account that compounds monthly at only 3.5% (a rate that will go up in time, again), add $100 each month for 10 years, and you will create more than $14,000 in savings in 10 years. In 20 years, that ongoing deposit will create nearly $35,000. As interest rates rise again, so will these savings.
Use this calculator for understanding interest on simple savings, and other parts of this site for learning about mortgage interest, home equity, refinance, and auto loans. http://bit.ly/9l6oin
Of course, there are more sophisticated methods for growing your buffer money, using advisors and money managers and brokers, but that is a long discussion for another time.
Finally, call your business accountant for a meeting to review all the ways you can save on taxes while creating a cash buffer. If your accountant is simply a tax preparer or bookkeeper, find a CPA who is specializes in small business planning as well as taxes.
The time to start is now.
“No Tickee No Washee” ~ Loyalty and Self-Protection in difficult economic times
Employees and consultants face the tough decision of continuing to work with a company that is struggling or failing, or returning to a highly troubled job market in this jobless so-called recovery.
Employees face reduced pay and increased work load. One V.P. of Marketing I know lost his staff of four more than a year ago, and has continued on doing the entire team’s work.
At another company, the team worked six months last year with no salary or consulting fees, then was restored to full salary but because they were “off-payroll” they had to pay their Cobra and other benefits out of pocket.
Consultants in such a situation can fare less well. When payroll is restored for employees, consultants are often paid much less than their previous retainer, even when functioning as a full team member and carrying the earlier responsibilities (or more). Employees have certain State and Federal legal protections which employers do not want to strain.
Consultants have only the protection of their contracts. In a failing company, a consultant’s options are often limited to stopping work once the pay stops. (Can you rub the fingers of one hand together and repeat “no tickee/no washee”? This may be more difficult than you think.) Or they can continue working with little or no pay to see if the company will survive and restore the full consulting contract. Consultants can track their arrears, but a failing company is not likely to pay them, regardless of the contractual language. Consultants do not have preferred standing in the debt hierarchy and lawsuits are expensive (and there may no be assets to win). Consultants must view their continuing to work for no pay or reduced pay as “keeping an eye on developments” in the company.
If the company is looking for a capital infusion, the new investors rarely honor these arrears, considering this work as “sweat equity” that was contributed to keep the company alive. At best, a consultant may negotiate partial payment for these arrears, usually less than 50% of what is due. Worse still, if the investors are looking to turn the company around, consultants are usually the first to go, with no settlement at all.
The blessing for consultants, unlike employees, is that they are skilled at always looking for more work, so they can sustain their perpetual hunt for gigs while working for less than full retainer. Consultants have multiple clients, so their revenue can be sustained by some clients while others are struggling. For consultants, the decision to stop work with a non-paying client is about assuring that your paying clients are being fully satisfied, about balancing the time available for finding and closing new business, and about not exhausting yourself with the pressure of work for no pay.
Employees are more disrupted by this situation, as they are not used to continuous job-seeking, and are accustomed to having their benefits covered (consultants always pay their own benefits, and this cost is built into their business model). Also, job hunting can be considered disloyal to the employer and by the employer, despite all rational reasoning.
This is the economic reality. There is an emotional reality as well. Employees, and many retained consultants, have built a part of their identity on their work, their company, their team and their employer/client. Emotions are irrational, and in face of all obvious economic need, emotions can interfere with rational self-interest.
Difficult as it may be, we must stay calm and focused on what is sensible to do. Folks have told me, “I can’t quit now – I’m the only one who can do this part of the work, and the company can’t keep going if I’m not there.” This may or may not be true, and it sounds loyal, but a good part of it (if you look closely) is ego and fear. Each of us is replaceable. It is astounding how a company can continue as “dead man walking” without any single team member. The other members of the team fill in the gap – perhaps not well, perhaps not happily, but they do it. Would that VP of Marketing ever have believed he could do the work of his entire team before he had to? Yes, he might be doing it less well, but he has continued in this way for more than a year. So, we must each remember how dispensable we are, and turn our focus to the realities of our own survival.
One person said to me, “My boss understands my value. She will protect me.” You may believe your employer and manager will protect you, and they may want to, but you may find that they do not have the power to protect you.
And you likely do not have the whole story. What top management knows and what it tells the troops are often far apart. Most management is not “open book.” Conditions are usually far worse than you understand, and decisions often come down very quickly.
So, continue your emotional loyalty, and then protect yourself. Finding the next gig or the next job will take longer than you think. Certainly, if you can support your team, and still protect yourself, that is best. And of course it is often easier to find your next role while you have a current role.
Your judgment is in the timing of it. You must look while you work, you must balance your energy and commitment with your compensation and your cold rational assessment of the likelihood that you will ever be paid again. Then you must generate the energy, positive self-confidence and cheerfulness to go out into the market projecting your true value. This may be the most difficult part of all, after months or years of dread every day at work. But clear your mind and actively look for your next new opportunity. It won’t find you if you stay in your cave.
Install the cable modem in the camp, please
Think of all those ads about taking your new wireless electronics to the beach and the mountains and far-away remote places filled with slow-moving life. You can have peace and quiet and still be connected. Well, not really. Maybe if your beach or mountain is within a half-hour drive of a major city, you can have that. But much of the world, and much of the U.S., does not enjoy the extensive infrastructure we take for granted in our cities. Here’s my recent adventure of planned escape (not yet concluded).
My husband and I often spend the summers Down East in Maine, near Acadia National Park, working and sailing. Infrastructure there is sparse at best. We get to stay in our friend’s camp when not on the boat (a 43’ French ketch).
Now, in Maine, calling a building a camp means it is a rudimentary, often hand-built structure, and this is so. About 250 square feet, with open eaves, our friend Cherie built this camp on her own, back in the woods. I watched her do it, more than 20 years ago. It consists of a single room with an equally large sleeping porch and an extended outside deck. The room holds the kitchen and my summer office. The sleeping porch holds the double bed (complete with my Tempurpedic mattress), a stand up piano, hanging drying herbs, and the dining room table which doubles as my husband’s desk. The big deck holds the grill and sun chairs, and the outdoor shower which cascades into an old claw foot bathtub next to a 200 year old looming pine tree. Hummingbirds and spiders shower with me – the spiders in their rainbow webs and the hummingbirds darting in and out of the water. I time my shower for sunshine.
The camp has electricity, hot and cold running water, an antique wood stove refitted with propane for making tea and eggs, and a refrigerator, vintage 1940. Supper comes off the grill and from over an acre of organic vegetables Cherie tends. There is a portable radiator-like electric heater for the cooler seasons (June and September), and lots of books settled into the open walls on shelves. What more can a girl need?
This township is so remote that there is no DSL from Verizon, even after all these years. Not enough folks to justify laying the lines. We are seven miles from the nearest small town with sidewalks. I park my car outside the local town library to pick up the wireless fast lines to participate in my clients’ webinars, where I can speak on the phone in private. I order a landline (which I haven’t had in L.A. for decades) six weeks early, and have rigged a 1980’s style switcher and answering machine, courtesy of Radio Shack (45 minutes away in the nearest big town). Then I can be online, get a signal that someone is calling in, drop the Internet connection and answer the phone.
Now, given the number of go-to-meeting conferences and Google whiteboard sessions I now have, it is time for a fast line into the camp. We had thought this impossible until now. But, turns out the camp is closer to Pole #30 on the local Route than the studio and the house on the far side of the 5 acre property.
Verizon owns the phone territory and DSL; Time Warner owns the cable territory. I call the Time Warner 800 number, hoping for a Mainer.
My first question, “Are you in Maine/”
“Yes, I’m in Portland.”
Now this is not the same as being Down east, north of which lies mooses, and farther north lies Canadians. But he sounds local, so we begin. He is very competent and understands what I want. He tells me the local truck will drive by and check out the property, then someone will phone me with an estimate. If I pay the installation fee and first month’s subscription, and wait 19 working days, I might (this is Maine after all) get cable installed in the camp. Remember the slow-moving life? This is it.
So he asks for directions from the big town 45 minutes away. I begin tracing the routes and towns and smaller routes through smaller towns toward the camp, then seven miles beyond the small town down the local rural road. He writes diligently. “I don’t have any place to put the pole number,” he says, but he can write down 8 minutes of directions. I’m grateful for his patience (this is Maine after all, where life is slow).
I get him past the local landmarks (“past the Campground on your right, to the 2nd driveway on your left, see the white satellite-dish-as-art on the ground with the names on it, turn in there…”). Then, go 100 yards down the driveway. On your right you will see a 40’ red tugboat on sawhorses (but it may be in the water, so don’t worry if you don’t see the tugboat), and on your right you will see the outhouse. The path on the right leads to the camp, a wood structure, painted sky blue.
“You can’t say outhouse,” he says, our Mainer from Portland, a real City down South.
“Why not?”
“Well, I know you are in California, but in Maine an outhouse isn’t an outbuilding, it’s an outhouse, you know?”
“Uh, I know. It is an outhouse.”
“No sh**? An outhouse? You mean it is a camp with an outhouse?”
“Right. So make sure they find Pole #30 and install the cable modem in the camp, not in the outhouse, o.k.?”
“Geez, of course. You know, I’m going to write down Pole #30.”
Capitalism and Corruption
This past week I’ve been contemplating corruption. And capitalism. And where the line is drawn that divides the two.
I am a good capitalist, American style. Having lived all over the world, I returned to the U.S. to start my consulting practice many years ago, because the richness of opportunity here did not exist anywhere else for a young entrepreneur.
And I am an honorable capitalist. But then, of the three major human motivators (power, fame and money), I am not motivated by money, so greed is not my weakness, and the line is usually very clear to me.
But I understand that the capitalist system gives a kind of permission to believe that “working the system” and especially “beating the system” by exploiting its weaknesses is just savvy business practice. We all remember Gordon Gekko (“greed is good”) http://bit.ly/a0rMTr from the film Wall Street in the late 1980s (since film never dies), who will return to us soon to a big screen nearby, just released from his fictional jail sentence.
As this recession persists (formally in economic terms, or just in its effects on folks), I know that our culture will continue to support smart people in finding new financial vehicles to contribute to their personal wealth without thought of its larger consequences. At the same time, this same tendency and talent is the other side of the coin of philanthropy, which we are seeing in abundance now as well. Both greed and philanthropy are in the nature of the human, in America or anywhere in the world, in whatever economic system they may live. In fact, it seems the U.S. has significantly less of the common-variety corruption (like bribes) than other cultures.
And this weekend, I listened intently to NPR’s This American Life’s current offering “Inside Job” (part one, nearly 40 minutes) on how Magnetar, a hedge fund, contributed to the economic breakdown which all players claim to “not have seen coming.” Turns out lots of folks saw the trick that was being played. Several bankers I’ve spoken with acknowledge this.
Now, I pay close attention to economics, because world and U.S. economics affect my early stage entrepreneur-clients, and we need to design our strategies in that larger context. So I know a good deal of what has happened these past years to get us to the horrible condition we find ourselves in today. Explaining all this in simple language is a challenge.
So I was intrigued by this broadcast, based on months of research conducted by ProPublica’s Jesse Eisinger and Jake Bernstein (also in a print version). Both give simple definitions of complex financial vehicles, how they work, how the system was exploited, and the consequences. The links in the article offer extensive background from the research, and even an 11-slide graphic show of what happened. Excellent simplicity!
So, I highly recommend you take the time to listen to and/or read this. Settle down for once, don’t be multi-tasking, and pay attention. And if you are so moved, let me know what you think.
This American Life http://bit.ly/9WdvT5
Propublica on Magnetar http://bit.ly/dbR6fg
Propublica slide show http://bit.ly/aG0enT
Lessons in successful hiring
I once “watched” Steve Jobs pursue my close friend when he wanted to hire her. He was an unrelenting suitor. He was charming and forthright. Once he had her leaning towards saying “yes,” he set out to woo her husband to support the move. I watched his campaign from her first words to me, “Very flattering, but I don’t want to leave my practice, my house, my friends” to her ultimate joy that she agreed, and her marvelous success from the choice.
I recalled this story last week (4.7.10) when attending Dealmaker Media’s L.A. Strategy Series “Don’t hire your BFF” http://www.dealmakermedia.com/events/10. Finding the right person with the best skills and a true fit to your organization’s culture is no simple matter, and a mistake is costly in time, money, morale and other company derailments that cannot be predicted. So perhaps Mr. Job’s ardent pursuit is a correct strategy.
Other interesting ideas were mentioned during this gathering, worthy of a short summary.
Hire folks smarter than you and make sure your hiring execs do the same.
- “A’s hire B’s hire C’s” was Jim Jonassen’s soundbite of the problem you must overcome.
Bring unusual and insightful questions when interviewing:
- What was your favorite failure?
- What was your worst hire?
- How do you see yourself in 5 years’ time?
Remember the importance of non-cash compensation, including:
- Acknowledgement and praise, both private and public
- Offering enough control to your hires that they can apply their maximum skills to any project
- Determining what motivates each of your hires, and giving it to them.
Consider what motivates different people and reward them accordingly:
- Task motivated people should receive reward compensation and be allowed to achieve their tasks’ goals.
- Analytic/intellectually motivated employees should be given the freedom to solve the problems set to them, then praised for it openly.
- Relationship motivated folks should be rewarded with personal or social time with the senior team, by way of acknowledging their achievement.
Thanks to Vince Thompson for his excellent moderation, and Jim Jonassen, Rich Battista, Brett Brewer and John Suh for their advice.